Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm
From: Jeff Spirer <jeff@spirer.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2000 12:03:51 -0700

Yes.

When someone's comment about one of my photographs is how sharp it is, I 
assume I have failed in my photographic objectives.  If all I have 
communicated is what I could show in a photograph of a test chart, what's 
the point.

At 12:50 PM 4/7/00 -0400, B. D. Colen wrote:
>Excellent point....Nor, I guess, would someone looking at two photos side by
>side, of different subjects, comment on the sharpness of the lenses they
>were shot with, rather than on the photos themselves, UNLESS one lens was a
>coke bottle bottom...and MTF graphs aside, that doesn't seem to be the case
>with the Cosinas. I know it's certainly not the case with the Nokton, which
>produces terrific results...
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Jeff Spirer
>Sent: Friday, April 07, 2000 12:30 PM
>To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Re:Consensus? Skopar 24mm
>
>
>At 08:38 AM 4/7/00 +0200, Hans Pahlen wrote:
> >Dominique,
> >Thanks for the numbers. Now I understand your point. What still puzzles me
> >is that Chasseur d'Images came to this radically different conclusion
> >about the Cosina 25.
> >I will shoot my sample wide open and at F/8 during the weekend and compare.
>
>Why?  Will it change your photographs?  Make them better or worse.
>
>Some people may want to have a gallery show filled with MTF charts for
>their lenses, but I would bet that no-one would visit.
>
>Jeff Spirer
>Photos: http://www.spirer.com
>One People: http://www.onepeople.com/
>

Jeff Spirer
Photos: http://www.spirer.com
One People: http://www.onepeople.com/