Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]> Admittedly, it's a bit slimy to turn around and try to auction it for more > money, then return it if it doesn't sell, but a 15-day return was the deal > and I am presuming it was returned in the same condition it was sent, also > > as per the original deal, was it not? Well, it goes without saying, that things are done 'in good faith'. The implied reason for a return is if the camera, it self, did not meet the expectations of the buyer, NOT if the buyer could sell the camera for more money or not. I believe the buyer was 'dealing' in bad faith, and as such, that removes the 'return' obligation from the seller to accept a return. JMHO... I certainly wouldn't have taken it back! That's a slimy as using it for a job, that you would have had to rent equipment for, and then returning it after the job is done...and getting your money back. How much 'crap' should one have to protect ones self from for trying to be honest? I don't believe one needs a 10 page contract if a little common sense (and common decency) is applied, and this goes against any common sense, and is certainly an abuse of the privilege offered by the seller. I guess common sense (and decency) is not so common...