Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] (Xtol) Why 1+3 dilution ?
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sun, 07 May 2000 10:54:30 -0700
References: <001001bfb7a4$10fe6410$640210ac@siege.jcberger.com> <3.0.5.32.20000507053746.00901100@pop.microtec.net>

Dan Cardish wrote:
> 
> But more dilution implies longer development times which in turn implies
> longer exposure to the sulphite which implies less grain.
> 
> Dan C.
> 
More time in a formula with less silver solvents (sulfite) in it, Dan!
Sodium Bisulfite is put in D23 to make it D25 for that very reason you describe.
It lowers the pH so it spends more time in D23's high sulfite environment.
Mush grain is the result.
Your focusing magnifier in you darkroom shows you a mushroom field!
Prints look like someone put Vaseline paste on the front element of a lens!
Mark Rabiner

Replies: Reply from "Julian Thomas" <Mimesis@btinternet.com> (Re: [Leica] (Xtol) Why 1+3 dilution ?)
In reply to: Message from "Jean-Claude Berger" <jcberger@jcberger.com> (RE: [Leica] (Xtol) Why 1+3 dilution ?)
Message from Dan Cardish <dcardish@microtec.net> (Re: [Leica] (Xtol) Why 1+3 dilution ?)