Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Cold light
From: Austin Franklin <austin@darkroom.com>
Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 12:15:52 -0400

>> You MUST reduceyou developing times from the "standard" Kodak times by
>about > 25%; even better, use a compensating developer like Rodinal or
>Acutol (better) AND > reduce your times by 25%. This will give a MUCH
>better result with the condenser > than youcan get with cold light. Trust
>me.
>
>Been there, done that.  Not even close.  I get a far better tonal range,
>and much better definition with my cold light than any procedure I have
>ever tried with a condenser.  The incandescent light source just can't do
>what the cold light source can...
>
>I also overdevelop my negatives by %30 for cold light printing.
>
>----------------------------------------
>

Are you using a Leica enlarging lens?

[Austin] No, I use Schneider lenses...I believe they are the Componon-S 
series...  Have you really tried a cold light?  You are the first person I 
have ever heard of claiming they get better results with an incandescent 
bulb than with a cold light...  As a note, I believe most scanners are cold 
light...someone correct me if I'm wrong on that please...

- --------------------------------------------