Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] cost Vs. Gear
From: "rlb" <rlb@triad.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 15:34:39 -0700
References: <20000523175158.26355.qmail@web1104.mail.yahoo.com>

I have just gathered up all my photo gear and heading for the camera shop.
I hope they will allow me something for it on trade for a pin hole camera.

Bob


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "J Vaughan" <sthawk_ontheroad@yahoo.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, May 23, 2000 10:51 AM
Subject: [Leica] cost Vs. Gear


>
> >
> >      Equipment does NOT make the picture, sorry fellas.  Maybe you
> > wouldn't
> > want to sleep with a dog of a camera, but the point is philisophical:
> > it's a TOOL to capture a moment of time, not a love interest.
> >
> >      Sorry to be a thorn in the toe, but money and talent are not
> > the same thing.
> >
>
>  Here Here!!
>  I shoot half of my stuff with a Polaroid.
> I bought the M6 to use in low light quiet scenes.
> When I was in college I had no money and  most of it went to film and
> paper. A camera is a just a light tight box with a hole in in one end.
>  The talent it takes to make images doesn't come from the gear you use
> it comes from practice.
>
> My  .02 cents
>
>  Jeremy
>
>  PS. a leica is a Very Nice light tight box BTW ;-)
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Send instant messages & get email alerts with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com/

In reply to: Message from J Vaughan <sthawk_ontheroad@yahoo.com> ([Leica] cost Vs. Gear)