Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/24

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: LUGMemo from Leica USA
From: "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 15:49:56 -0400
References: <4.1.20000524141659.02a24f10@gateway.photoaccess.com>

But if Jeff enumerates the consequences, will he face the consequences?

Actually, dealers tell me they don't have a lot of mark up to deal with
anyway, but they sure get excited about selling a Leica!

Tom Schofield

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Brick" <jimbrick@photoaccess.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>; <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 5:20 PM
Subject: [Leica] Re: LUGMemo from Leica USA


> At 11:32 AM 5/24/00 -0700, Brougham wrote:
> >
> >What does MAP stand for?
> >
> >When I was shopping around, I wondered why all the new equipment
> >seemed to be price fixed.
> >
>
>
> Minimum Advertised Price. They can sell it for less, but cannot advertise
> it for less without consequences. Jeff Alford can enumerate the
consequences.
>
> I guess you could call it APF. Advertised Price fixing.
>
> Jim
>

In reply to: Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: LUGMemo from Leica USA)