Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/05/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Noctilux vs 50mm f/2
From: "Simon Lamb" <s_lamb@compuserve.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 10:58:57 +0100
References: <200005260952.e4Q9qtG00369@helme.stelvio.nl>

I thoughtI would ask this as a general question although I did raise the
issue in a reply to another message.

I have been told that if I purchase a Noctilux I should keep my 50mm f/2 as
the Noctilux should be regarded as an additional lens rather than a
replacement.  Can anyone tell me the possible rationale behind this point of
view and whether you agree with it or not?

Thanks.

Simon

Amateur efforts at http://www.phoenixdb.co.uk/leica

Replies: Reply from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] Noctilux vs 50mm f/2)
Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Noctilux vs 50mm f/2)
In reply to: Message from Arne Helme <Arne.Helme@stelvio.nl> (RE: [Leica] Dirty finder)