Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Poor Leica QC
From: Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 21:38:32 -0400
References: <3966789C.8DB830DF@sympatico.ca> <4.1.20000707181555.0589c870@gateway.photoaccess.com>
 
Yes, I figured that a few minutes ago.

Thanks



Jim Brick wrote:

> Vick,
>
> I think you should have one leg longer than the other by now.
>
> M. is musing that the thing that Solms cannot QC is the recipient of the
> lens/camera.
>
> :-)
>
> Jim
>
> >Vick Ko jotted down the following:
> >
> >> Do you mind if you describe the problem?
> >>
> >> Poor focus, poor depth of field, glare, ???
> >>
>
> >At 09:01 PM 7/7/00 -0400, Martin Howard wrote:
> >
> >Mostly its composition.  Often the subject matter is plain boring.
> >Sometimes the exposure is off.  At times there's clear evidence of camera
> >shake.  But mostly its composition.  Or boring subject matter.
> >
> >M.
In reply to: Message from Vick Ko <vick.ko@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Poor Leica QC)
Message from Jim Brick <jimbrick@photoaccess.com> ([Leica] Re: Poor Leica QC)