Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/11
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]>X-From_: animaster@hash.com Tue Jul 11 09:01:18 2000 >Delivered-To: muldoon@smtp5.teleport.com >Delivered-To: muldoon+cactusbud.com-X-studio@cactusbud.com >X-Sender: royzart@pop.connix.com >Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2000 21:43:18 -0400 >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >From: Roy Zartarian <royzart@connix.com> >Subject: [Leica] OT: Xtol problem >Mime-Version: 1.0 >Sender: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Precedence: bulk >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > >LUGs, > >The part A powder in the two packages of Xtol purchased last week was caked >inside the foil pouch as if the powder had become damp. This powder did >dissolve okay. Two test "disposable" rolls of Ilford HP5 came out of the >development process satisfactorily, but a subsequent roll of Ilford 3200 >looked a little thin. > >>From photo.net I learned that Kodak has had some packaging problems with >this product and that results with caked Part A were inconsistent. I did >email the folks in Rochester from their web page about the situation but >have not yet received a reply. > >Much as I liked what Xtol can do, I guess until Kodak cleans up its act, >I'm going to jump on the ID-11 bandwagon. > >Roy > > CACTUSBUD STUDIO Mike Lium 3D Modeler http://www.cactusbud.com __________________________ studio@cactusbud.com - Mike Lium zella@teleport.com - Candy Wilcox Member A.F.T.R.A