Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Noctilux
From: "Julian Thomas" <mimesis@btinternet.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2000 18:43:16 +0100
References: <D188C0B350C0D211ACB10008C75D7CA302E03267@nssczeusex9.navsea.navy.mil>

There was a thread recently where several people were buying/using
Noctiluxes to photograph births ;-) The time to worry is when Kyle gets
one!!

Julian

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Peterson Arthur G NSSC" <PetersonAG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 5:55 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Noctilux


>
> Uh, what are we talkin' about here, Noctilux or Noctilust?
>
> Art Peterson
> (perpetrator of three kids, all pre-Noctilux)
>
> :-)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Thomas [mailto:mimesis@btinternet.com]
> Sent: Friday, July 21, 2000 12:42 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Noctilux
>
> Most people around here seem to have proved a causal link between a
Noctilux
> and babies - so if the latter isn't on the agenda, better stay away from
the
> former!!
>
> Julian
>
>
>
>

Replies: Reply from Harrison McClary <harrison@mcclary.net> ([Leica] If Kyle got a Noctilux)
In reply to: Message from Peterson Arthur G NSSC <PetersonAG@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL> (RE: [Leica] Re: Noctilux)