Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: landscapes and people
From: Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2000 09:04:02 -0400
References: <l03130300b59f2ce70565@[216.40.160.83]> <3.0.32.20000722101420.006b69d4@box4.tin.it>

Dan:

This may be true but it didn't help me. 6x7cm and 4x5 inches didn't produce
any better results for me. It has to be in the eye of the phootgrapher and
it just isn't in mine.

Ken Wilcox

At 7:49 -0400 7/22/0, a fine scholar, Dan Cardish wrote:

>I think landscape photography benefits from larger film sizes.
>
>Dan C.
>
>At 06:53 AM 22-07-00 -0400, you wrote:
>>Robert:
>>
>>I share your affliction. In all the years I've been doing photography
>>(about 40) I've taken exactly ONE decent landscape shot. Not that I haven't
>>tried! I've wasted more film on this activity than I'd like to admit.
>>
>>People shots also seem to be my forte. I can usually get nice activity and
>>portraits with little thought and using just about any equipment. Go figure.
>>
>>Ken Wilcox


- ----
Ken Wilcox                                Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
					  preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com>
 		      			  <kwilcox@gfn.org> 

In reply to: Message from Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com> ([Leica] Re: landscapes and people)
Message from Robert Appleby <robert.appleby@tin.it> ([Leica] landscapes and people)