Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/07/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] M4-2
From: Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net>
Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:03:00 -0500
References: <7f.7d085e8.26b6e6d9@aol.com>

y Leica book states the M4 went out of production in 1975. It then came out with
the M4-2 in 1977 to meet the continuing demand of pro photogs. It was a modified
version of the old M4 with out a hot shoe or self timer. It could be used with a
motor drive.

When they are on Ebay, they seem to bring a lower price than regular M4s. I have
read comments that allude to more prone to mechanical  problems. Same for the
M4-P.

CapsTeeth@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 7/31/00 8:08:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> mimesis@btinternet.com writes:
>
> << Can anyone tell me why the M4-2 is often reviled? I've just had a chance to
>  take my recentlyCLA'd M4-2 out and I love it - I much prefer to my M6. The
>  shutter release is so much more positive and need so little travel. With a
>  softie it is perfect. The M6 feels slacker for some reason. OTO at least I
>  could get a backup fairly cheaply!
>
>  Julian >>
>
> I had an M4-2 for many years and it functioned as any other M.  My M4 and M2
> feel even smoother in operation, but the function is the same.  Eyes closed I
> couldn't feel any mechanical workings difference between M4-2 and M6.  All
> told, I prefer M6, because of the meter.

Replies: Reply from Bill Satterfield <cwsat@cyberhighway.net> (Re: [Leica] M4-2)
In reply to: Message from CapsTeeth@aol.com (Re: [Leica] M4-2)