RE: [Leica] Street photography

["B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net>]

I think, if I may speak for - was it The Deadman? - the definitions were
written tounge-firmly-in-some-cheek-or-other, and were meant to convey the
world view of those who would wreck havoc on a major urban downtown area in
the names of freespeech and the environment. Änd my guess is that the vast
majority of them would tell you that Chomsky was their dentist, or one of
the Moms in the carpool in which they rode to oh-so-private grade school,
rather than Noam. :-)

B. D.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Julian
> Thomas
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2000 5:01 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Street photography
>
>
> >     freelance = lackey of whichever capitalist is currently
> paying you to
> > misrepresent the truth. It also tells them you are on your own.
> >
> >     journalist = running dog of the mainstream media which as everyone
> knows
> > are all owned by sinister corporations and give pictures of
> rioters to the
> > police
>
> You've been reading too much Chomsky!
>
> Julian
>
>