Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica M2
From: Ken Wilcox <wilcox@tir.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Aug 2000 07:06:33 -0400
References: <336ECDAFDF7DD311B9E30090277AEE4102C64253@nt-exchange-bby.pmc-sierra.bc.ca > <399ACB5B.35AD2AFF@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

Steve:

I find the easiest to use on the M2 to be the MR or MR4 because of the
direct coupling. If I'm not using that or a spot meter, I'll use an old
selenium celled Zeiss Ikophot most often.

Ken Wilcox

At 9:28 -0700 8/16/0, a fine scholar, Steve Caspersen wrote:

>What meter do you suggest?
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Mark Rabiner" <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
>To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 10:11 AM
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica M2
>
>
>>
>> I think the Leica M2 is a GORGEOUS camera and I'd kill to have one.
>> I have no problem with using a little separate meter.
>> Mark William Rabiner
>> :)
>>


- ----
Ken Wilcox                                Carolyn's Personal Touch Portraits
					  preferred---> <wilcox@tir.com>
 		      			  <kwilcox@gfn.org> 

Replies: Reply from "Roland Smith" <roland@dnai.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Leica M2)
In reply to: Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Leica M2)