Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V17 #338
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Aug 2000 20:28:18 -0700
References: <200008200027.RAA01833@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <000e01c00a30$bad1e640$0217640a@interaccess.com>

asparaco@metafour.net wrote:
> 
> >
> > > From: "Matt Morgan" <mattmorgan@pdseurope.co.uk>
> > Subject: Re: [Leica] 24mm, 75mm
> > >
> > Hmmm.....just when I was happy that all my lens choices had been made, now
> > I'm all undecided again:-)
> > The 75mm is a very expensive lens which is one consideration, but I do
> like
> > the idea of the extra speed and certainly the "razor thin DOF". I'll
> > probably still go with the new 90mm APO f2, but I would like to hear of
> any
> > experience with >
> You might consider your other lenses a 75/1.4 is a good match with the
> 35mmf1.4 and the 50mmf1.4 or the Noc.  The 90Apo is a nice match with the
> 50mm f2 and the 35mmf2. I have both 75 and 90 use the 75 on a .72 and the 90
> on a .85. The 90apo is smaller and lighter then the 75mm. The 35/50/90 are
> the only three lenses you need to shot 95% of everything >my opinion only!
> 
> regards
> asparaco/chicago
> asparaco@metafour.net

asparaco! this idea of "matched lenses" like this is new to me!
a 75/1.4 and a 35mm f1.4? Both 1.4?
50mm F2 and the 35mm F2 both F2? 
That makes them matched? They work together better somehow as a team?
I don't know about that one!
Markwr

In reply to: Message from asparaco@metafour.net ([Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V17 #338)