Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/08/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?)
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2000 19:42:47 +0200
References: <69.971978d.26d1d484@aol.com> <39A0CF34.D7B5543C@webshuttle.ch> <39A12332.BC903F0@sumter.net>

Now, here we have a truly intelligent comment. The power of Wilber's reasoning
simply leaves me speechless.

Nathan

Wilber Jeffcoat wrote:

> Bull Shit!
> Wilber
>
> Nathan Wajsman wrote:
>
> > Pop Photography and other magazines of its ilk have a very simple equipment
> > testing methodology: whichever manufacturer happens to be the biggest
> > advertiser during the period of testing wins the test.
> >
> > Nathan
> >

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

Replies: Reply from Wilber Jeffcoat <jeffcoatphoto@sumter.net> (Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?))
In reply to: Message from ARTHURWG@aol.com (Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?))
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?))
Message from Wilber Jeffcoat <jeffcoatphoto@sumter.net> (Re: R lens tests (was: Re: [Leica] Re: Why M is so popular?))