Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/19
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Paul Chefurka wrote: > > Gasp! Profaning the sacred shape of the Barnack Negative???? Aren't you > the guy who prints a lot of 6x9's on 11x14 paper? What's wrong with a 4x6 > except that it's too small to be big, and too big to be small? > > 4x6 lab prints are a pain in the @$$ to file, though. That really gets in > the way of editing and storing your work. I've got boxes and boxes of lab > envelopes stuffed with 4x6's. Every once in a while I think of switching to > trannies, but then I just load up another roll of Supra 400 and off I go > down the road to perdition once more... > > Paul It's not the ratio i don't like. I LOVE 2 over 3. It's the SIZE. 4x6 inches too many bad pictures have been made that size imo markwr