Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] B&H complaint
From: "Peter Shier" <pshier@mindspring.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2000 14:48:57 -0400

I just bought some Tri-X 135-36 (USA) from B&H for $3.09. Cambridge is
cheaper than that?

Peter

- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of B. D. Colen
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 2:41 PM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: RE: [Leica] B&H complaint


The funny thing is, I'd rather do walk-in business with Cambridge than with
B&H, although, in most cases, I need to go to B&H to find what I need....But
Cambridge has a nice old grundgy camera store sort of atmospher...and a
better Trix price than B&H!.....At B&H I feel like a cow being herded
through the chutes to slaughter....and by and large the sales folks really
don't know a hell of a lot...On the other hand, when I've ordered stuff it
has shown up when and as promised, with no problems what so ever.....

B. D.

God, but I used to love Willoughbys near Grand Central..:-)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Bill Lawlor
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2000 2:31 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: [Leica] B&H complaint
>
>
> I doubt this story. It does not fit my experience with B&H. However,
> it sure fits my long ago experiences with Cambridge.
> BillLawlor
>