Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/02
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Jem and Lucien, If memory serves, Leica told us that a 35-50-90 lens is possible. But they also urged us to imagine how much such a lens would obstruct the 35mm frame. Cheers, Mikiro on 2/10/00 1:09 PM, Jem Kime wrote: > Lucien, > thanks for this, I must admit that upon re-reading my notes it seemed more > unlikely than likely. > Sorry for the confusion, I'll delete this from further reproduction. > Jem > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lucien [SMTP:director@ubi.edu] > Sent: 02 October 2000 11:13 > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: Re: [Leica] Photokina LUG report (1b) > > Jem Kime wrote: > >> Lucien - Will there be any different Tri-Elmars? >> Leica - Certainly, a 35 - 50 - 90 is not a problem. > > Jem, > > I didn't ask that question and maybe I'm wrong, but I don't > think the answer was so affirmative. > > > Lucien >