Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/10/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Vs: [Leica] viso/65elmar
From: "Raimo Korhonen" <raimo.korhonen@pp2.inet.fi>
Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2000 21:56:36 +0100

Yeah - but is this difference really demonstrable in practice? I have the chrome version (of 1963) and it is very, very, very good.
All the best!
Raimo
photos at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen

- -----Alkuperäinen viesti-----
Lähettäjä: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Päivä: 08. lokakuuta 2000 17:40
Aihe: Re: [Leica] viso/65elmar


>At 08:47 PM 10/8/2000 +1000, A.H.SCHMIDT wrote:
>>From what I've read, the black ones are slightly better optically. 
>
>Horst, the first version was chrome and OCMOR/11062;  the second lens was
>the 11162, and was recomputed optically and redesigned mechanically, and
>was in black finish.  The first lens was introduced in 1960 and the
>recomputed version took its place in 1970.  The lens left production in 1984.
>
>Marc
>
>msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
>Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!
>
>

Replies: Reply from "A.H.SCHMIDT" <horsts@primus.com.au> (Re: Vs: [Leica] viso/65elmar)