Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Test Certificate
From: "Emanuel Lowi" <mano@proxyma.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 13:55:01 -0500

Dante A Stella wrote:

>We have heard that the workers in Germany, Portugal, Switzerland and Canada
>were trained to be extremely good about quality, even when there were no
>certificates  So why should they now need certificates as incentives?  Sounds
>like a Franklin Mint "certificate of authenticity" to me.
>
>And what is it really saying if a IIIg or an M3 did not need one, but yet M6s
>do?  That would tell me that something is wrong or was wrong with M6 quality
>control in the past and that it needed to be corrected with extreme measures.
>
> After all, the M6 is brought almost completely assembled into Germany, there is at
least 60%
>(~$1200) in "value-added" activities going on there.  We know from previous
>posts that a lot of that value is in the calibration and checking department.

>Certificates could undermine the Leica name.  Quality is better achieved by
>keeping any signed certificates in the factory with the rest of  the records
>and not airing dirty laundry in public.

In fact, new IIIg and M3 cameras DID come with tags signed with the responsible
factory employee's name. So did many other Leica camera models in the old days. Not
sure when this practice died out, but IMO anything that Solms does that harkens back
to the way things used to be done at Wetzlar is a good thing - and not simply for
nostalgic reasons. I hope they do it with the lenses too - a factory-trained
independent technician often mentioned favourably on the LUG told me yesterday of the
awful finishing and assembly found inside new lens mechanisms these days. A little
responsibility would sure be nice.

As for the 60% value added in Germany including a lot of calibration and checking,
I'm not so sure. Recently, Hans-Peter Lammerich  posted here: 

>According to OECD guidelines a "Made in Germany" stamp requires that 60%
>of the product's value-added (including marketing, r&d, management
>overheads) is from Germany. 

This means that the higher cost of plumbing in the Solms executive washroom (vs. the
workers washroom in Portugal), the German r&d costs and even the high cost of
printing in Germany (no wonder most Leica literature is printed there) are all
factored into the final Made in Germany calculus.

Emanuel Lowi
Montreal

Replies: Reply from "Terry Sham" <tsham@netvigator.com> (Re: [Leica] Test Certificate)