Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2000/12/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] In defense of Tchaikovsky (was: Highquality porn)
From: Martin Howard <howard.390@osu.edu>
Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2000 16:06:41 -0500

Stanislaw Stawowy jotted down the following:

> Actually the problem is both Stravinsky and Prokofiev
> wrote the funniest music i've heard ever. But
> listening
> this music requires a really big humour muscle :-)
> 
> And Tchaikovsky sucks - THE most boring. Along
> with Mozart and Wagner (his music is like
> sauce without meat)
> 
> And hands off from Bach!!!!!!!!!!!

OK, I guess it's time to confess: I actually quite like Tchaikovsky.  I'm
not massively familiar with his stuff, but every once in a while that
sweeping romanticism is quite OK.  Good Sunday afternoon music.

Stravinsky is great stuff, but not easy listening.  I'll agree with the
comment about humour.

Mozart, I find, is remarkable.  A great deal of his music is just absolutely
perfect.  Every note, every beat, every nuance is as it only could be.
Within a single piece he constructs a framework and then plays within that
framework to perfection.

Bach doesn't tickle me: he's too intellectually clever.  I'm sure he was
brilliant, but I listen to music for aesthetic, emotive, and empathic
reasons, not intellectual ones.  Which, I guess, is why I can quite happily
listen to Tchaikovsky and Mozart, but find Bach rather boring -- he adheres
to rules too much, rather than playing with them.

Britten is another of my favorites.  Again, great sense of humour in some
pieces.

M. (not very well versed in classical music)

- -- 
Martin Howard                     | "Go sell crazy somewhere else.  We're
Visiting Scholar, CSEL, OSU       |  all stocked up here!"
email: howard.390@osu.edu         |                    -- Melvin Udall
www: http://mvhoward.i.am/        +---------------------------------------

Replies: Reply from bfranson@greennet.net (Bill Franson) (Re: [Leica] In defense of Tchaikovsky (was: Highquality porn))
Reply from Jim Brick <jim_brick@agilent.com> ([Leica] Re: In defense of Tchaikovsky (was: Highquality porn))
Reply from john <bosjohn@mediaone.net> (Re: [Leica] In defense of Tchaikovsky (was: Highquality porn))