Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/01/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 24 vs. 36 exposure rolls
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 23:11:50 +0100
References: <008e01c07998$a3393880$9897b018@hldsbrg1.sfba.home.com>

Not necessarily, since you can always turn the film around and scan from the
other end.

Nathan

Oliver Bryk wrote:

> Regarding some of the comments related to fitting the developed film into
> archive pages: if you scan your negatives, a criterion for cutting the film
> is the maximum number of frames accepted by the film scanner (5 in the case
> of the HP S-20)
> Oliver Bryk

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

In reply to: Message from "Oliver Bryk" <oliverbryk@home.com> ([Leica] 24 vs. 36 exposure rolls)