Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/02/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V19 #129
From: "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:55:06 -0800
References: <200102160536.VAA03119@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <004a01c09822$22c7bfc0$a9531718@norr1.pa.home.com>

Time's "Man of the Year" doesn't create or even imply an endorsement of the
person's actions. Only that the person selected had (in the mind of Time's
editors) the most significant impact on world events for that year.

Bryan



- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Edward Birch" <edwbirch@home.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 6:09 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V19 #129


> > Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 01:19:42 -0000
> > From: "Hugo Lopes" <hal@netc.pt>
> > Subject: [Leica] Re: Nazi Paraphernalia
> > Message-ID: <00f301c097b6$ab181c60$eca912d4@hugo>
> > References: <200102151833.KAA24378@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
>
> <snip> - - Do you read Newsweek? (They elected Hitler man of the year in
> 36)<snip>...
>
> Uh...that was *Time* magazine, and the year was 1938, man of the year for
> Hitler.
>
> Interestingly, another butcher, Stalin, was twice Time magazine man of the
> year 1939 and 1942.
>
>
> Ed Birch, Pennsylvania. R5, M6, M3, and wartime IIIC.
>

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V19 #129)
In reply to: Message from "Edward Birch" <edwbirch@home.com> ([Leica] Re: Leica Users digest V19 #129)