Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/08

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Any comments on Leica CL??
From: "onetreehillclw" <onetreehillclw@compaq.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2001 19:24:50 -0600
References: <000501c0a515$f8e7a200$7debb3d1@oemcomputer> <3AA2F96F.9F658621@hemenway.com> <3AA55ED3.2987160F@webshuttle.ch> <3AA825F8.3C3BA92F@interbit.pl>
 
good choice on the CL. but, you can not use lenses faster then f2,and
you cannot use the collapsible ones. the CLE is considered tobe a little
better of a camera. that's what i've heard. the 40/f2 is a great
underappreciated lens.

chris williams
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mateusz Skalski" <mskalski@interbit.pl>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 6:38 PM
Subject: [Leica] Any comments on Leica CL??


> I am going to buy myself an used Leica, and it's going to be my first
> one
> I am thinking about the CL model
> The advantages are:
> compact size
> low price (comparing to other models)
> 40mm/f2 lens
> and, of course, because Sven Nikvist is using that camera:)
>
> What can you tell me about it, is it a good choice?
>
> Matias Skalski
> http://art-foto.art.pl
>
In reply to: Message from "Douglas Landrum" <dflandrum@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] comments and critique invited)
Message from Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com> (Re: [Leica])
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica])
Message from Mateusz Skalski <mskalski@interbit.pl> ([Leica] Any comments on Leica CL??)