Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3
From: arbos@mac.com
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 12:01:18 +0100
References: <3AA8F154.AB96F2C3@ubi.edu> <a04320400b6cea885da2d@[130.79.76.31]> <049801c0a929$d62e84a0$e904c53f@pabell.net> <3AA9D965.4D5C56D8@rabiner.cncoffice.com>

At 11:36 PM -0800 01.3.9, Mark Rabiner wrote:
>Ken Iisaka wrote:
>>
>>  What's interesting is that despite the "Sonnar" name, it is not in the
>>  Sonnar configuration, which can be described as a modified Triplet, with
>>  cemented doublet, or triplet in the middle, and a singlet, or a cemented
>>  doublet in the back.  The configuration is pretty unique, though resembles a
>>  Tessar, with a cemented doublet behind it.
>>
>><Snip>
>Sonnar has a better ring to it than Tessar, Ken!
>35 has a better ring to it than 38 as well.
>I think money is the issue. To sell lots of cameras.
>I find the overall look of the camera appealing.
>I expect the results to be quite good and the price right.
>I've got a jacket pocket that needs a camera in it.
>Terminator 3 is coming up!

A Tessar rival is a Fujifilm KLASSE.

http://www.fujifilm.co.jp/klasse/klasse-p01.html

This camera is less expensive than T3 with a bit less sophisticated design. 
But its AEB (bracketing) function may be helpful to some users.

In reply to: Message from Lucien <director@ubi.edu> ([Leica] OT: Contax T3)
Message from Mikiro Mori <arbos@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)
Message from "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)