Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/10

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2001 13:15:07 -0800
References: <3AA8F154.AB96F2C3@ubi.edu> <a04320400b6cea885da2d@[130.79.76.31]> <049801c0a929$d62e84a0$e904c53f@pabell.net> <3AA9D965.4D5C56D8@rabiner.cncoffice.com> <3AAA4F05.84DE5F6F@umich.edu>
 
><Snip> 
> Sonnars are great in the 38 to 40mm range: you have the T Sonnar 38/2.8, the
> Rollei HFT-Sonnar 40/2.8, the original Zeiss Tenax 40mm f/2, and (I believe) the
> Contaflex TLR.  All were great fun.  Even the 40/2.3 on the XF-35 wasn't that bad
> (the camera was, though).
> 
> Dante
> 
I don't get it my only Sonnar is my fist Hasselblad lens.
The 150 F4 Sonnar C lens i got in 1979.
And which i seem to be sotl replacing the rear element as i put a big scratch on it.

Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
In reply to: Message from Lucien <director@ubi.edu> ([Leica] OT: Contax T3)
Message from Mikiro Mori <arbos@mac.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)
Message from "Ken Iisaka" <ken@iisaka.org> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)
Message from "Dante A. Stella" <dante@umich.edu> (Re: [Leica] OT: Contax T3)