Re: [Leica] Survival guide

["Dan States" <dstate1@hotmail.com>]

I have found the Delete function to be my best tool for survival on the LUG.

So much of the forum is dedicated to personal horse whipping and ego 
enhancement that it is a rare and valued post that is worth reading or 
commenting on.  All hail the archives!  At least there we can search for 
meaningful content...Usually by the names of the contributors.  Over time it 
becomes possible to identify meaningless posts without even reading them! 
(mine included:)


Best wishes
Dan States

>
>We all know about the many guides for survival in hostile environments, be
>it a desert, the urban jungle or the Lug.
>If you want to become a member of this collective, there are a few things
>you should do and many things you should not even dare to think about. Here
>we go:
>Always note that current Leica management does not know its business.
>Produce a list of features that are lacking in current Leica products and a
>list of products they do not even manufacture. Then announce that it is
>obvious "they" should make those things, as it is evident where the money
>is.
>Always note that the M3 is way better than the M6. Never give facts, but
>remark that you know from highly qualified people within Leica or from
>independent repairpersons, who for obvious reasons want to stay anonymous
>that the M6 is a piece of crap, jeopardizing its legend by using some
>plastic parts. If you want to very popular, then hint that there is even a
>Japanese influence behind current Leica products.
>Always exclaim that you will never trust facts, as facts are EITHER
>worthless as not being releveant for a working photographer OR being
>delivered by persons who obviously are untrustworty as they seem to know 
>too
>much. Expand on this by noting that anyone who is consistently positive
>about Leica or Leica-oriented products that they must be paid to be
>positive.
>Be very careful to make at least two critical and one very negative remark
>per week  about current leica managament and current Leica products to
>bolster your credibility. If you have nothing new to say, just repeat what
>you said before: better to repeat your own stories than have to listen to
>someone else's nonsense.
>Chop to pieces anyone who dares to note that he just buys Leica because he
>likes it or has the money for it. Leica is for cognoscendi like yourself.
>If someone asks you to explain your point (any point), stay very calm and
>remark that you have used Leicas for at least two decades, that you own a
>lot of hard earned equipment and that this is enough qualification. Reagon
>even became president on a flimsier base. If you wish to kill your 
>opponent,
>remark that you have friends who are real photographers.
>
>Always show superior knowledge and a firm command of the act of Leica
>photography to say that current Leica lenses employ glass elements from
>japanese factories and that MTF graphs are worthless as they are designed
>for flat objects. When asked to explain why this is relevant, you can 
>easily
>hide your ignorance by referring to an article that you have some where in
>your file or that you  have heard it from a real expert.
>On the other hand feel free to refer to the MTF graphs published on the
>Internet if you need evidence that a non-Leica lens is as good as a leica
>lens, or the other way around.
>Occassionally indicate that you have access to inside information, as you
>are close with high ranking Leica officials and you know more than you may
>tell. It is safe to do so, as you may not reveal anything and so nobody
>knows what you really know.
>Publicly distrust anyone who has closer contacts with the company officials
>that you have: they do not know where to draw the line.
>Always disqualify persons who are supposed to be on Leica's payroll. But
>always refer to the books of Kisselbach and Osterloh as the best sources 
>for
>true Leica info. They must have the real info as they are/were inside the
>company. The obvious inconsistency can be easily countered by the fact that
>BMW owns Rolls-Royce and that is no problem at all.
>Never engage in a real discussion. That is boring and dangerous as you 
>would
>have to change your mind or viewpoint. If there is a remote possibility 
>that
>a serious discourse about Leica photography  is emerging, you have two
>escape routes: start a discussion about the use of filters on a Leica lens
>or about the need to blacken your red dot on the camera OR throw in a few
>remarks about pornography in current photography.
>Follow these guidelines and you will survive easily.
>
>Erwin
>
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com