Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm confidentialitynotices/IIIf shutter noise
From: Jim Hemenway <jim@hemenway.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:03:10 -0500
References: <A56D15874A0AD311BC8E0090274E754905DA4F85@houex01.bakerbotts.com>

Isn't it interesting that we have to put up with Mark's sophomoric
comments every day whereas HE can't take an occasional "legal notice"
signature.



Tom.Henson@bakerbotts.com wrote:
> 
> I have just posted a reply to this comment that I have disabled the legal
> disclaimer from my future postings and apologize for not realizing this
> would be an issue.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barker, J. Madison [mailto:Matt.Barker@KutakRock.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 9:40 AM
> To: 'leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us'
> Subject: Re: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm
> confidentiality notices/IIIf shutter noise
> 
> Mark Rabiner wrote:
> 
> I guess we haven't had anyone from the big law firms until now!
> If they can't control their own email we could have them stay off!
> 
> Mark Rabiner
> 
> Portland, Oregon
> USA
> Updated ALL MY DESIGN webpage!!
> http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
> 
> *****
> 
> Mark, I've been here with my firm's default notice for some time.  It's
> drawn comment, even.  But I rarely post, and maybe you're filtering me
> anyway.  Whatever.  I'll comply with whatever rule Brian comes up with.
> Should we boot everyone with tag lines, even those flogging web pages in
> CAPITALS!!?!!
> 
> On topic:  My IIIf's shutter is considerably louder than my M6's.  I think
> someone posted recently that his III was about as quiet as an M.  I've never
> been around LTM cameras much, other than my own.  Can some of those with
> broader experience comment?  TIA,
> 
> Matt Barker
> 
> ######################################################################
> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
> (including any accompanying attachments) is intended solely for its
> authorized recipient(s), and may be confidential and/or legally
> privileged.  If you are not an intended recipient, or responsible
> for delivering some or all of this transmission to an intended
> recipient, you have received this transmission in error and are
> hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from reading, copying,
> printing, distributing or disclosing any of the information contained
> in it.  In that event, please contact us immediately by telephone
> (402)346-6000 or by electronic mail at postmaster@kutakrock.com and
> delete the original and all copies of this transmission (including any
> attachments) without reading or saving in any manner.
> 
> Thank you.
> ######################################################################

Replies: Reply from Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com> (Re: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm confidentialitynotices/IIIf shutter noise)
In reply to: Message from Tom.Henson@bakerbotts.com (RE: [Leica] WAS: Dust in New Lenses NOW: Law firm confidentiality notices/IIIf shutter noise)