RE: [Leica] Re: K64 vs. Provia F

["Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com>]

Well,

A colleague and fellow lugger, who used to use a lot of KM recently thought
he would try it out again. His comment was along the lines of never again.

Sent out to wherever Kodak processes in Canada now - film back in terrible
condition, dirt, crap, spots - the works.

Put me off using up those last few rolls (Oh that, and the time a few years
ago when they neatly sliced through the centre of each frame and mount half
of two different images in each frame mount - these were shots of Iqaluit up
in the arctic, shots of I place I haven't been able to return to since -
Kodak's response? They sent me a new roll of film).

Tim A

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Tarek
> Charara
> Sent: April 4, 2001 2:51 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: K64 vs. Provia F
>
>
> le 04.04.2001 5:37, Nathan Wajsman à wajsman@webshuttle.ch a écrit :
>
> > I do use the Provia F films as well, but when I have the slides
> on a light
> > table
> > and look at them with a good loupe, or when I project them with my Leica
> > Colorplan projection lens, the Kodachrome slides clearly stand
> out in terms of
> > sharpness and crispness. Their color rendition is neutral,
> which is what I am
> > looking for.
>
> Nathan,
>
> I stopped KR25 because I thought it had a reddish/pinkish look to it.
>
> Tarek
>