Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/04/04

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Scala
From: ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Apr 2001 14:23:34 +0800
References: <5.0.1.4.0.20010401140700.00a5c860@206.34.200.40> <5.0.1.4.0.20010402113513.00a647a0@206.34.200.40> <006e01c0bb97$e9074f00$ce757bd5@btopenworld.com> <00ab01c0bbdc$8040bf20$82120e18@phnx1.az.home.com> <3AC92941.3BED7194@netvigator.com> <3ACBF5D3.8DAC0F5A@webshuttle.ch>

Nathan,

I am in Hong Kong and Scala has to be special ordered from the Agfa agent, and for
processing sent to Japan.  Turn around time takes about two weeks and around $12/roll
excluding the film and shipping.  A friend of mine loves Scala and shoots nothing
else; however he doesn't shoot much and let the exposed film sit in his refrigerator
until he has accumulated enough to spread out the shipping charge for Japan
processing.  While I find this to be pure hassle this is not the reason why I am
sticking to XP2 and 400CN.  By the way processing K64 is more of a hassle and I like
K64 more than Provia!

First of all I really like Scala.  On the lightbox it has the glow not unlike a
sparkling wet b&w print, and the tones are alot like TX.  However I am currently
in-between technologies: having moved here from the States I have given up access to
a darkroom and now don't even do my own film processing due to the chemicals and
children thing; and I haven't completely devoted myself to a digital darkroom since I
only shoot around 30 rolls per week with a mix of color prints, slides and XP2.
These days what I want is a digital file with as much information on it as possible
to take advantage of output technologies available today and tomorrow; but at the
same time I want to retain the analog source, i.e., negative, on file for traditional
printing if the chance ever comes along again.   I just feel the new XP2 satisfies my
current requirements.  I get prints from it in one hour and I scan the shots I like,
do what I need to do on the Mac and save it for future use.

Nathan Wajsman wrote:

> Ray,
>
> Scala can give you the best of both worlds: a slide to project and something to
> print from. Depending on where you live, Scala processing need not be any more
> difficult than normal E6. When I lived in Brussels, I took my Scala to a lab that
> did same-day service; here in Zurich I just drop it off at a photo lab near my
> office and get the slides the following day at a price that is 2 CHF (about $1.30)
> higher than for E6.
>
> Nathan
>
> ray tai wrote:
>
> > What is the advantage of shooting Scala?  Film and processing are not widely
> > available and expensive.  I have used it a few times and believe CN400 scans
> > better.  You can't print Scala in a tradition B&W darkroom and color chemistry
> > is not the ideal choice for B&W due to the color cast.  What is the point of
> > shooting Scala unless your primary purpose is for projection?  Please educate
> > me!
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Ray
>
> --
> Nathan Wajsman
> Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
>
> e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch
>
> General photo site: http://belgiangator.tripod.com/
> Belgium photo site: http://members.xoom.com/wajsman/
> Motorcycle site: http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/1704/

Replies: Reply from ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com> (Re: [Leica] Scala)
In reply to: Message from "Michael E. Bérubé" <MEB@goodphotos.com> ([Leica] Week 13: SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from "Michael E. Bérubé" <MEB@goodphotos.com> ([Leica] Week 13: SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from "Simon Lamb" <simon@sclamb.com> ([Leica] Re: [Leica] Week 13: SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from "Steve Barbour" <kididdoc@home.com> ([Leica] SCALA! [Bérubé])
Message from ray tai <razerx@netvigator.com> (Re: [Leica] Scala)
Message from Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch> (Re: [Leica] Scala)