Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/09

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Canadian lenses: THE MARK OF SHAME!
From: Guy Bennett <gbennett@lainet.com>
Date: Wed, 9 May 2001 10:53:26 -0700
References: <3.0.6.32.20010509112317.00856900@pop.infi-net.mindspring.com>

>I too would like to say that the Washington D.C. fire department can relax.
>Ted and I will be postponing our visit now that Marc has decided to see
>reason. Actually we never got as far as the border as Ted insisted on
>drinking all the single malt scotch we brought for fire starter.
>
>John Collier :-)


I knew it!

Guy



>Who were those two masked Leica toting drunk guys....
>
>> From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
>>
>> For some reason, no one seems to have realized that my posting on this
>> topic was a rather sarcastic spoof.  A checking of the LUG archives for the
>> past seven or eight years will show that I have been a stalwart defender of
>> Midland quality -- the simple reason why half my Leica lenses are Canadian
>> is because there is absolutely no difference between Midland and Wetzlar in
>> quality with a VERY few exceptions.
>>

In reply to: Message from Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net> (Re: [Leica] Canadian lenses: THE MARK OF SHAME!)