Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] feuds
From: "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 09:19:24 -0600

Nope, You're right Marc - Arius somehow sneaked in instead of the Schism
after me reading some of my old theology books and a long night and day of
newborn baby feeding! I think one thing is for sure - babies and theology
don't mix - though babies and leicas do.

How's that for back on topic. Now we can get back to the burning question of
how to shoot a birth....

Tim A

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Marc James
> Small
> Sent: May 16, 2001 5:40 AM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] feuds
>
>
> At 10:06 PM 5/15/2001 -0600, Tim Atherton wrote:
> >You certainly are an expert, though your analysis of the Arian
> controversy
> >and the politics of the time is certainly quite simplistic.
> >
>
> Well, my discussion of the politics of the period WAS simplistic;  as I
> indicated, these matters are far too complex to lend themselves readily to
> one-line analyses.
>
> And I never mentioned the Arian Controversy at all, as it was effectively
> dead several many centuries prior to the Great Schism:  the elimination of
> the Goths as a cultural force saw to that!
>
> Marc
>
> msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> Cha robh bas fir gun ghras fir!
>