Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] an ethical question....
From: "Margaret Jeffcoat" <margaret01@excelonline.com>
Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 15:24:25 -0400
References: <200105161813.OAA07695@unix2.netaxs.com>

Well the shots are very good specially the cake cutting shot.
But for you to do anything at this point I think would still cut
into the situation with the contracted photographer. I don't know
where you are or what your thinking but $80 for an 8x10 is way
high. So maybe you got better shots and maybe you didn't. Your
vision was surely different than his and you've not seen his images
yet. I think it would be nice to chill unless you really want to do
this guy some damage.
BTW with your closing line about not being paid to look at
someone's wedding shots-hope that was tongue in cheek- as this
is the last view I make of your work.
Cheers Wilber Jeffcoat
- ----- Original Message -----
From: Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2001 2:13 PM
Subject: [Leica] an ethical question....


> hey folks -- last week linda and i went to her cousin mike's wedding and,
> as i sometimes do, i tossed a leica and a 50 1.5 into the car and took a
> couple of pictures in between challenging the best man to "just one more
> shot, you sissy." my own personal perception is that i probably got
> better shots than the pro they hired. but that's just my own casual
> observation. he seemed to somehow be missing everything -- but in any
> event we get a call from someone in the family who says "can we see the
> pix you took?" and my ethical dilema is ... if i show them the pix now,
> it'll most likely screw the real photographer out of a lot of reprints --
> after all, why spend $80 on an 8x10 when your cousin has one just as good
> and he's willing to give you the negatives. so my inclination is to put
> off letting anybody see anything for at least a couple of months, and then
> just make them a wedding present of all the negs. i think it's rude to get
> in the way of the real photographer, and it's even ruder to undercut his
> bread and butter. but at the same time, i get to look like a real rube to
> the family -- and also, what's my obligation to them? why should i be
> siding with someone i don't even know?.... what would you do? what's the
> wedding ettiquitte? i'd like to hear from anybody who actually _shoots_
> weddings too. maybe i could just give them 3 8x10's now and in a couple
> months send them the rest?
>
> and in case anybody's interested in the awesome power of a canon 50mm f
> 1.5 in ltm on a leica m6:
>
>  http://www.asc.upenn.edu/usr/cassidy/pix/5-12-01-wedding/
>
> kc
>
> (not that you could pay me to look at someone elses wedding pictures even
> if robert capa took them)

In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com> ([Leica] an ethical question....)