Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/05/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 12:30:31 -0700
References: <200105180235.TAA25031@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> <009401c0df7e$5f2caa90$4d02a8c0@neurosoft.lan>

We assume the wedding photographer was using better glass that Kyle was.
This is a very important moment in these peoples lives to put it mildly, and
deserves to be recorded as well as possible.
Which has more value. A crappy picture taken by a crappy wedding photographer
with a Zeiss Hassy lens?
Or a sensitive natural light taken of the decisive moment by an artistic
photographer using funky but fun old canon glass?
The ideal of course is to get the second guy to use better glass but what the
hell no one hired him to be there in the first place, he's just playing around.
It's just a wedding.
From the standpoint of my work and being on the lug i find this very frustrating.
One of these days we'll get a younger brilliant real photographer like Johnny
Deadman and Kyle on the LUG who will also have a real appreateiation of Leica Glass.
This photo could have been of better technical quality than the wedding
photographers, not worse.
And should have been if you ask me.


Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/

In reply to: Message from "Richard W. Hemingway" <rheming@attglobal.net> (Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh)
Message from "Stanislaw B.A. Stawowy" <watteau@krakow.neurosoft.net> (Re: [Leica] Canon 1.5 Bokeh)