Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Fw: Elmar-M 50/2.8
From: "onetreehillclw" <onetreehillclw@compaq.net>
Date: Sun, 3 Jun 2001 08:07:28 -0500
References: <90.15466f22.284b8a74@aol.com>

Thanks Seth. By the way, I liked your article on the 50 summicrons in the
new Viewfinder. Will have to look at trying the DR. I only have the 11817
version.

Chris Williams

- ----- Original Message -----
From: <SthRosner@aol.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, June 03, 2001 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: [Leica] Fw: Elmar-M 50/2.8


> In a message dated 6/3/01 1:15:55 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
> onetreehillclw@compaq.net writes:
>
> << My question is......both lenses are 4 elements in 3 groups.
>  > Is it the coating on the new lens that makes it better? >>
>
> New computation, new glass, new coating.      Seth   LaK 9

In reply to: Message from SthRosner@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Fw: Elmar-M 50/2.8)