Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Use of Tripod (Was Copyright questions)
From: John Hudson <xyyc@home.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2001 13:48:19 -0700
References: <p05010406b75036d80da9@[64.130.153.253]>

Herbert & Lee Kanner wrote:
> 
> Yes, I would really love to see this question taken into the courts.
> I understand restrictions on tripods where they could interfere with
> pedestrian traffic (e.g. N.Y. Times Square),  or present a nuisance
> and hazard, as in a museum.  But the notion that if you are on a
> tripod, you are a professional photographer and are going to use the
> pictures commercially should be challenged.
> 
> One friend was kicked off what appeared to her to be a public
> sidewalk by a private security guard because she was trying to
> photograph the building of Oracle, the software firm in Redwood
> Shores, CA.  Another friend told me that if they think you are a
> professional, they won't permit you to take photographs in any public
> park in San Jose, CA unless you pay something like $45 for a permit
> that is valid for only a few hours.


Under what authority does the city of San Jose attempt to restrict one's
right to take photographs in a public park? 

jh

Replies: Reply from "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com> (Re: [Leica] Use of Tripod (Was Copyright questions))
In reply to: Message from Herbert & Lee Kanner <kanner@acm.org> ([Leica] Use of Tripod (Was Copyright questions))