Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/21

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jun 2001 06:23:55 +0200
References: <NABBLIJOIFAICKBIEPJJIEENKEAA.darkroom@ix.netcom.com> <002e01c0fab4$279976c0$60088ed1@hppav> <3B329EAF.5A693437@earthlink.net>
 
Slobodan Dimitrov writes:

> I went back to my car and got out a camera
> and knocked out a quick roll of chromes. While
> this was going on, the non-union contractor
> started to video tape the leafleting.  I walked
> up to the two individuals and told them that
> they could be in for a lawsuit from any of
> the passersby. As it was assumed that they had
> a reasonable expectation of privacy outside the
> store, in spit of being on Target property.

Why was it okay for you to take photographs, but not okay for them to videotape?
And why would anyone have a reasonable expectation of privacy outside the store?
Replies: Reply from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)
 In reply to: Message from "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com> (RE: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)
Message from "Bryan Caldwell" <bcaldwell@softcom.net> (Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)
Message from S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net> (Re: [Leica] Home depot and the rest)