Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/06/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]"Griffith, Lucian" wrote: > > All this talk about Tri-X has me wondering if anyone has any opinion / > preference for Tri-X over T-Max? For B&W 35mm I've been using T-Max 400 > rated at 250ASA, developed in D-76, for years, simply because it's what > I've got used to. Has anyone done any comparison between Tri-X and T-Max > which could point to any preferences either way? My apologies if this issue > has been discussed before. > > Lucian G. IMO TRI it is not Tri x any more. It really doenst have that Tri x look of old. T grain films are SO much sharper and finer grain it is not funny. Yes they are harder to use. You must not be quite a casual with your metering and developing. But they are well worth it. Both the Delta and the Kodak T grain films. Mark Rabiner make mine Xtol 1:3! shaken and not stirred Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/