Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux
From: "Jorg Willems" <jorg@mindspring.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 12:38:14 -0400
References: <200107161621.MAA29501@unix2.netaxs.com>

That's news to me!
I thought that square root of 2 always constitutes one stop.

1 - 1.4 - 2 - 2.8 - 4 - 5.6 ... and so on.
What's wrong with my thinking?

Jorg
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Kyle Cassidy" <cassidy@netaxs.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux


> >Currently, I own a 50mm Summilux and sometimes I think I want one
> >more stop.
>
> fwiw, f 1.0 is NOT one stop faster than f 1.4, it's only a third of a stop
> faster. so unless you're looking at your images and shaking your head
> saying "damit! it's a third of a stop underexposed!" you're okay with your
> summilux...
>

Replies: Reply from Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)
Reply from "Tom Schofield" <tdschofield@email.msn.com> (Re: [Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)
In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <cassidy@netaxs.com> ([Leica] re: should i buy a noctilux)