Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/07/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Austin writes: > Can't 20kHz be sampled by a 44.1kHz sampling > rate? Of course, but you seemed to be implying that the extra 4.1 kHz was required to resolve 20 kHz, and that is not the case. Even 40.001 kHz would have sufficed. > Just claiming 2700PPI is sufficient to sample 53 > lp/mm in EVERY case is not substantiation, it is > a claim, and a faulty one at that. No offense, but I prefer to give the theories of people like Shannon and Nyquist more credence than yours, mainly because they can show the reasoning behind them, whereas you have chosen not to do so for your own assertions.