Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format
From: "Mxsmanic" <mxsmanic@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2001 12:00:16 +0200
References: <LNBBLBNFHNEHGFKFMALGCEJMNDAA.tim@KairosPhoto.com>

A properly-sized pinhole should be able to beat any Leica lens, too, as long as
exposure times are not an issue.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 03:25
Subject: RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format


> mmmm - I just compared an 8x10 print from my "new" 12" Ektar equipped
> Deardoff V8 with an 8x10 print from my 50mm 'cron (and tripod mounted) M6 -
> I can tell, even that size, the 46 year old Ektar sure as hell knocks the
> socks off my 1990's 'cron!! (including excellent colour rendition - very
> rich - both on Portra 100NC)
>
> WAY sharper to the naked eye.... :-)
>
> Just dump the Medium format stuff and go properly big - hey 8x10 street
> photography is fun
>
> Tim A
>

In reply to: Message from "Tim Atherton" <tim@KairosPhoto.com> (RE: [Leica] Leica Quality versus Medium Format)