Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/08/21
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Sorry, finger trouble - that 'no' before 'a rangefinder' should have been removed. Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Raimo Korhonen Sent: 21 August 2001 19:39 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Vs: [Leica] bessa T body But there is a rangefinder - it´s the Bessa L which has no viewfinder and no rangefinder. All the best! Raimo Personal photography homepage at http://personal.inet.fi/private/raimo.korhonen - -----Alkuperäinen viesti----- Lähettäjä: Steve Unsworth <mail@steveunsworth.co.uk> Vastaanottaja: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us> Päivä: 20. elokuuta 2001 23:50 Aihe: RE: [Leica] bessa T body >There's no viewfinder. > >Being serious, there's no a rangefinder but you have to use an auxiliary >viewfinder to frame the shots > >Steve (who is sort of considering a bessa T with Leica's 21-24-28mm >viewfinder) > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >[mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Nguyen, >Olivier T [AMSTA-AR-CCF] >Sent: 20 August 2001 19:31 >To: Leica (E-mail) >Subject: [Leica] bessa T body > > >what do they mean when they say no viewfinder ? > >