Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/09/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] OT re the N****n 135 3.5 LTM
From: Marc James Small <msmall@roanoke.infi.net>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 21:30:53 -0400
References: <01fe01c147a2$5a3e7040$bd3afea9@oemcomputer>

At 08:04 PM 9/27/01 -0400, David Kieltyka wrote:
>I own one of these too, in chrome. Like most '50s era Nikon products the
>Zeiss influence is evident. It's solid, hefty, beautifully made. Sharp as a
>razor. It even has a tripod socket, which IMO all 135s should have. I agree
>with Dante here...this Nikkor is an example of the imitator one-upping the
>original.

I believe Dante was suggesting that the Nikkor 3.5/135 was superior to the
4/135 Nikkor.  I am restraining myself with GREAT difficulty but,
seriously, folks -- check out the archives.  A theft can never be superior
to the original.  I really AM trying to be good!

Marc

msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from "David Kieltyka" <dkieltyka@csi.com> (Re: [Leica] OT re the N****n 135 3.5 LTM)
In reply to: Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> ([Leica] OT re the N****n 135 3.5 LTM)