Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/01
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Dan, You are correct, and it is in this issue that Canon is lacking. They may get better, but getting the Canon S800 to play properly with Photoshop is a total mystery and relatively easy with the Epson. Another example, there are NO matte paper's supported in the Canon list. As I suggested earlier, the Canon SW and drivers are a bad joke. Too bad. I'm very happy with the CanoScan FS2710 and the S100 digital camera. On Monday 01 October 2001 09:13 am, Dan Post wrote: > I sorta have the urge to jump in here- after a few false starts with > digital printing, I have to say that the matter of color control is very > important, and I didn't really get a good handle on the basic print until I > got a new monitor, a KDS, and installed the drivers. The drivers included a > set of .icm files, which were installed too, and which I used in the Epson > software setup- set the one for my monitor as the default, and basically > let everything print as 'automatic'. > Since I don't have the wherewithal to get a montior colorimeter, and the > software to generate my profiles, this has made a great improvement in my > outputs, in that I actually get a WYSIWYG output, or very close to it. This > makes the paper costs, and per print cost a lot more reasonable! > Using Epson paper, and Epson inks, the output has improved immensely. > Dan > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- Dave Hillman http://www.hillmanimages.com/bw/ - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html