Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 2.0 ASPH M or 35 1.4 ASPH M
From: Nathan Wajsman <wajsman@webshuttle.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 07:45:55 +0100
References: <003e01c160dc$00e89a40$52151b18@austin.rr.com>

If they are equally priced, it is a no-brainer. The Summilux is as good as the
Summicron at every aperture from f2 onwards, and vastly better at f1.4...

Nathan

Mark Ritter wrote:

> In 800 words or less, which do you buy and why?  Assume for arguments sake
> they are equally priced and in equal condition.
>
> Mark
> mritter@austin.rr.com
> Austin, Texas USA
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland

e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch

Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm




- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Mark Ritter" <mritter@austin.rr.com> ([Leica] 35 2.0 ASPH M or 35 1.4 ASPH M)