Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/30

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 35 2.0 ASPH M or 35 1.4 ASPH M
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@rabiner.cncoffice.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 12:55:14 -0800
References: <B8035350.16237%jbcollier@powersurfr.com>

John Collier wrote:
> 
> Mark,
> 
> Who needs 800 words?
> 
> Size: f/2
> 
> Price: f/2
> 
> Speed: f/1.4
> 
> Performance: equal
> 
> That is it.
> 
> John Collier
> 
> Sorry for being so garrulous, who even needs 18 words?
> 
> > From: "Mark Ritter" <mritter@austin.rr.com>
> >
> > In 800 words or less, which do you buy and why?  Assume for arguments sake
> > they are equally priced and in equal condition.
> >
> 
I have the Summicron but would KILL for the Summilux!
What you could not shoot with that lens i don't know.

I'm going to end up getting one in the next year and giving my wife my Summicron.


Mark Rabiner

Portland, Oregon
USA

http://www.rabiner.cncoffice.com/
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@powersurfr.com> (Re: [Leica] 35 2.0 ASPH M or 35 1.4 ASPH M)