Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/10/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Photodo ratings for 35mm Summilux -MASPH and 50mm Summilux-M
From: Feliciano di Giorgio <feli@d2.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 21:57:15 -0800
References: <20011101034716.44206.qmail@web9101.mail.yahoo.com> <005901c16297$68ec87c0$56234d18@gv.shawcable.net>

Hahahaaa, Ted you're killing me over here.
;-)

feli


>Ted Grant wrote:
> 
> This testing BS has never been of any interest to me at any time in my
> career, as my parameters have always been simple, aperture, the fastest
> possible, how close it'll focus and that it stays together while being used
> by a professional photographer in the many venues of life on a day to day
> basis.
> 
> The rest is merely poppy cock BS ! Of course this is one of my usual candid
> opinions offered freely about the techie number stuff! ;-)
> ted
> 
> Ted Grant Photography Limited
> www.islandnet.com/~tedgrant
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Ray Moth <ray_moth@yahoo.com> ([Leica] Photodo ratings for 35mm Summilux -MASPH and 50mm Summilux-M)
Message from "Ted Grant" <tedgrant@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Photodo ratings for 35mm Summilux -MASPH and 50mm Summilux-M)