Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Which Photo now pellicle mirrors
From: Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com>
Date: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 17:49:25 -0800
References: <IBEKJMCACOLAIGAMCBPIOEAGCBAA.fmaturana@euskalnet.net> <3C0941D1.42386248@markrabiner.com> <00ca01c17ac9$6c3df720$bd3afea9@oemcomputer>

Don Dory wrote:
> 
> Mark, really!? Hot dog, for how much?  That would convert another 20% to
> Leica.  Those of you who have never used a good pellicle SLR system have got
> to try it.  Look through the viewfinder waiting for what may come and when
> it does, boom, you got it and you saw that you got it; sorta like a M
> 
> Don Dory

I've always been intrigued by the Pellicle predicament.
Even since the first Canon Pellicle camera.

Mark Rabiner
Portland, Oregon USA
http://www.markrabiner.com
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Félix López de Maturana <fmaturana@euskalnet.net> (RE:[Leica] Which Photo magazines are good?)
Message from Mark Rabiner <mark@markrabiner.com> (Re: [Leica] Which Photo magazines are good?)
Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Which Photo now pellicle mirrors)