Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/16

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Scanned images for FOM2
From: ternahan <ternahan@sonic.net>
Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 14:02:05 -0800

It is also ok to do silver....

> From: John Straus <Mail@SlideOne.com>
> Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2001 12:45:18 -0600
> To: "leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us" <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Subject: Re: [Leica] Scanned images for FOM2
> 
> on 12/16/01 11:15 AM, Tina Manley at images@InfoAve.Net wrote:
> 
>>> Tina has suggested jpegs
>>> around the 25Meg size.
> 
>> Tiffs would definitely be better if you are burning them on a CD to
>> mail.  For those who are sending them electronically, a jpeg would be a
>> smaller file size and not clog up your lines as long.
> 
> I think this is what is causing confusion. The original message suggested 25
> MB jpegs so why not just send the same size tiff. A clarification of what is
> really needed to be sent should be stated and I'll keep note of it for my
> FOM2 year 2 images ;)
> -- 
> John 
> Chicago, IL 
> http://SlideOne.com
> ====================
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html